In a new lawsuit, the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa alleges the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers violated federal environmental laws when it granted a permit to Enbridge for its proposed Line 5 reroute.
Canadian energy firm Enbridge secured a federal permit for the $450 million project from the Army Corps in late October. The company said that permit is not yet final.
Earthjustice filed the lawsuit Tuesday on the tribe’s behalf in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The tribe is accusing the Corps of violating the Clean Water Act and National Environmental Policy Act. Bad River is asking a federal judge to overturn the permit and final environmental assessment for Enbridge’s Line 5 reroute.
The complaint states that the Corps failed to adequately assess environmental effects of construction and ensure the project would avoid or minimize harm. The tribe’s attorneys also argued the federal agency violated the Clean Water Act by issuing the permit as a legal challenge to state approvals for the project remains ongoing.
Enbridge spokesperson Juli Kellner said the company’s permit applications have undergone extensive environmental review. Kellner said the Corps issued the company an initial proffered permit, which has not yet been signed or finalized by the agency or Enbridge.
“Until the permit is signed, USACE has not engaged in a judicially reviewable final agency action. Enbridge will move to intervene in the lawsuit and defend the USACE’s forthcoming permit decision,” Kellner said in a statement.
A DNR attorney testified the project is the most studied in the agency’s history, undergoing nearly four years of review. The agency received more than 32,000 public comments on the proposed reroute, and the DNR maintains it properly applied the state’s stringent permitting standards in line with the law.
Supporters have touted the project’s roughly $135 million economic impact and creation of 700 union jobs during construction. Farm and business groups have voiced concerns about the potential for fuel price hikes and a propane shortage if the reroute doesn’t move forward.
“Today’s baseless law suit is another disappointing development in the now nearly six-year effort to relocate Line 5 so it can continue to supply needed energy to our state and region,” the Wisconsin Jobs and Energy Coalition said in a statement.