According to canada goose outlet canada George Jesse

Dangerous dog laws

canada goose coats Dogs were a feature of Roman canada goose outlet in vancouver life, used as weapons of war and kept as pets. The ancient ‘lex canada goose outlet houston Pesolania’ could be seen as a forerunner to the Dangerous Dogs Act making owners culpable for canada goose outlet woodbury the behaviour of their dog. canada goose coats

Canada Goose online In canada goose outlet orlando the third century BC, unruly dogs were apparently such a problem that a law was passed that ensured owners were responsible for canada goose outlet miami any injuries or damage the animal caused. Canada Goose online

canada goose store “If a dog was in a square or public canada goose outlet uk fake road and not tied up in the daytime and did mischief the owner was liable,” according to the late canada goose outlet london uk Liberal MP and Roman historian Henry John Roby. canada goose store

canada goose black friday sale First finesA nineteenth century study of the British dog seems to suggest attacks on people have been a continuing cause for concern. According to canada goose outlet canada George Jesse, dog related fines were introduced under Alfred the Great. canada goose black friday sale

canada goose black friday sale The law, which could date as far back as 849 AD, said: “If a dog canada goose outlet locations in toronto tear or bite a man, for the canada goose jacket outlet sale first misdeed let six shillings be paid.” Fines increased for repeat offences. canada goose black friday sale

canada goose coats 1839 Metropolitan Police ActUnder the act, Victorian Londoners could be fined up to 40 shillings if canada goose shop uk they let canada goose outlet online reviews their dog loose “in any thoroughfare or public place”. canada goose coats

cheap Canada Goose Anyone with an “unmuzzled ferocious dog” that they allowed “to attack, worry, or put in fear any person, horse or other animal” was liable. cheap Canada Goose

Canada Goose Parka Dog owners in the rest of England faced the 40 shilling fine or a new punishment of two weeks in prison when the Canada Goose Parka

Town Police Clauses Act of 1847

canadian goose jacket extended the law to “every person. in any street” if their dog was deemed to be dangerous and not on a lead. canadian goose jacket

Canada Goose Outlet 1871 canada goose coats uk Dogs Act Canada Goose Outlet

canada goose clearance The law abroad canada goose clearance

Canada Goose Jackets Since canada goose victoria parka outlet the canada goose outlet store uk UK’s much maligned 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act, several states have considered banning dog breeds. Canada Goose Jackets

Canada Goose Parka According the RSPCA, European and world governments introduced legislation as a direct response to media pressure following fatal dog attacks as occurred in the UK. Canada Goose Parka

canada goose deals In Vancouver, Canada and Belgium officials decided banning specific breeds would be ineffective. canada goose deals

Canada Goose Outlet A review of Dutch dog laws found their act canada goose outlet los angeles had failed to control the banned types or reduce bite numbers. Canada Goose Outlet

Canada Goose online But canada goose outlet washington dc one study in Berlin did find that the legislation had been a success reportedly cutting the number of bite canada goose outlet 2015 incidents. Canada Goose online

canada goose coats on sale Described by the government as “an act to provide further protection against dogs”, the canada goose coats on sale

Canada Goose Outlet 1871 Dogs Act Canada Goose Outlet

buy canada goose jacket gave a police chief the power to take a dog from its owner and either put it down or sell it. buy canada goose jacket

Canada Goose Outlet But then as now, the law had its opponents. Canada Goose Outlet

Canada Goose Parka The Lord Chancellor worried that an owner might still be liable even if they “had no previous knowledge of any mischievous propensity in Cheap canada goose outlet the dog”. What if a “playful dog, intending no mischief, might tear a canada goose jacket outlet uk man’s trousers?” he asked peers. Canada Goose Parka

Canada Goose Jackets The government argue that because the act is not part canadagoose-sale of canada goose parka outlet criminal law, the standard of proof is lower and unlike the infamous 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act it can be used to impose controls or confiscation of canada goose outlet store new york dangerous dogs where an offence has taken place on private property. Canada Goose Jackets

canada goose clearance sale “It is particularly appropriate for action on behalf of people such as postmen and women who are regularly at risk from dogs in front gardens,” according to the Department for Food and Rural Affairs. canada goose clearance sale

canada goose coats on sale 1989 Dangerous canada goose outlet belgium Dogs ActUntil canada goose outlet new york city 1987 dog owners were required to buy a 37p ‘dog licence’. But canada goose outlet kokemuksia the licence was widely ignored and when the first Dangerous Dogs Act was introduced, ministers said they would not reintroduce it. canada goose coats on sale

Canada Goose Parka The canada goose outlet parka 1989 act increased the 100 year old powers available to the court giving magistrates the power to disqualify perpetrators from owning a dog Canada Goose Parka.