|
|
|
||||
|
|
SB 212: Comparative Narrative |
|
|||
|
CONTRACT MINIMUM ANNUAL PAYMENT SENATE
: Senate SB 212 applies to contracts that have annual MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute applies to contracts
that Moulton eliminates any contract with an average monthly payment of $1,000 or more. WIB corporate counsel Gary Antoniewicz says, “This is really the heart of the bill. I have seen software and computer contracts with payments in excess of $10,000 per month. WIB members don’t complain about $100 per month contracts. The complaints I have received involve well in excess of $1,000 per month and I know of no reason to make such an arbitrary cutoff.” Moulton’s language exempts Big Business and the big costs while repudiating the concerns of Wisconsin small business owners. Compare Senate SB 212 page 2; line 13 & Moulton Assembly substitute page 1; line 11. The Assembly Small Business Committee ultimately overrode Moulton’s $12,000 and set the exemption limit at $60,000, still vastly lower than the Senate’s $250,000. TELECOMMUNICATIONS & CELL PHONES SENATE
: SB 212 Senate amendment 5 exempts the lease or purchase MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute exempts “A contract for The Senate language, negotiated with representatives of the telecommunications industry, provides specific protections to small businesses if the telecommunications giant wants its contracts to be exempt. The Moulton language bluntly exempts the Big Business telecommunications industry and provides no protections for Wisconsin small businesses. Compare Senate SB 212 amendment 5 & Moulton Assembly substitute page 2; lines 14 & 15. DEFINITION OF SELLER SENATE
: Senate SB 212 says “’Seller’ means the provider of a MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute exempts many businesses The Moulton language, requiring work “to be performed in this state” exempts most credit card and other data processing firms from the bill because their work is NOT performed in Wisconsin. Attorney Gary Antoniewicz says, “There is no apparent reason other than to gut the bill. If a Wisconsin company signs a contract for credit card processing, the company might well be located in another state such as Texas. Further, the processing may be performed in Texas, another state or even other countries such as Mexico or India. Many times the Wisconsin business may have no idea where services are actually ‘performed’ nor should this matter.” Credit card processing is one of the most egregious service industries using hidden automatic renewal contract clauses to trap small businesses in almost perpetual contracts. Unless the credit card company does its processing in Wisconsin it is exempt under the Moulton amendment. Moulton gives every break to out-of-state Big Business while ignoring the concerns of Wisconsin small businesses and farmers. Compare Senate SB 212 page 3; lines 5 & 6 and Moulton Assembly substitute page 3; lines 3 & 4. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED TO SMALL BUSINESS CUSTOMER SENATE
: Senate SB 212 says that a business contract with
automatic MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute says the contract is The Senate version details specific steps the Big Business seller must take to inform the small business customer. The vague Moulton approach could be as simple as a buyer signature on a contract which may be no disclosure at all. Compare
SB 212 page 3;
lines 7-25 and
Moulton Assembly substitute page 3; lines11-13. SENATE
: Senate SB 212 says the seller must provide notice to the MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute says the customer must
be Compare SB 212 page 4; lines 1-24 and Moulton Assembly substitute page 3, lines 14-17. SB 212 was created as a response to calls to the WIB member HOT LINE. Many small Wisconsin businesses are being trapped by hidden automatic renewal clauses buried in tiny print in a multiple page contract from a big out-of-state business. The Senate bill language provides solid protection for small businesses that could be trapped by hidden clauses in 5 or 10 year contracts. The Moulton substitute deletes all of that protection. REMEDIES & PENALTIES SENATE
: Senate SB 212 says that if the seller attempts to
enforce the MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute has NO remedy or penalty Compare SB 212 page 4 lines 1-15 & page 5, lines 1-21 and the entire Moulton Assembly substitute. Under the Moulton substitute Big Business can ignore the law with impunity. INITIAL APPLICABILITY SENATE
: Senate SB 212 says “This act first applies to contracts
for MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute says “This act first
applies The Senate bill says any new, renewed or modified contract is covered by this bill at the time it begins, is renewed or modified. The Moulton Assembly substitute says the gutted bill would apply ONLY to new contracts signed after the Moulton Assembly substitute go into effect as law. Moulton removes small business protection and gives all the advantage to out-of-state Big Business. Compare
SB 212 page 5;
lines 23-25 and
Moulton Assembly substitute page 4; lines 1-3. SENATE
: Senate SB 212 makes no reference to leases of equipment MOULTON
: The Moulton Assembly substitute exempts “a contract for The Moulton language exempts leases for all these types of equipment, even leaving farmers in jeopardy. Compare the entire Senate SB 212 and Moulton Assembly substitute page 2; lines 22 & 23.
Thank
you for taking the time to review this legislation and the damage
that was done. WIB is happy to discuss this legislation. Call our
toll-free member HOTLINE at 800-362-9644. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||||